Ksenia Dyomina

Education

• Ural Federal University (1990-1995)
• Ural Federal University (1999)

Experience

• Ural Federal University (1999-2003)
• Gorodissky and Partners since 2003

Languages

• Russian
• English

• Trademarks and service marks
• Appellations of origin and geographical indications

• “Trademarks: unexpected sound” (Business Blogs Sostav.ru, March 2023)
• “Double message: how not to name a brand” (RBC Pro, January 2023)
• “Trademarks - what do we get when we register them?” (Gorodissky and Partners Information Bulletin, #3 (135), 2019)

Presentations

• “Trademarks - asset or ballast” (Business meetings on IP protection issues, Krasnoyarsk, Novosibirsk, October 2022)
• “Trademarks - what do we buy when we register them?” (Seminar “Development of national intellectual fund. Features of patenting in Russia and abroad”, Nizhny Novgorod, September 2019)
• “Means of individualization types. Trademarks” (II Urals innovation forum, Ekaterinburg, November 2012)
• “Trademark as an effective tool for competition” (seminar “Actual questions of trade management”, Ekaterinburg, September 2010)
• “Means of individualization” (Municipal program of small and medium business support, May-June 2010)
• “Practical aspects of effective trademark (brand) protection as the primary goods and services promotion tool. Trademark use and consequences of its nonuse” (seminar “Trademark - effective tool of competition”, Ekaterinburg, April 2004)

• Out-of-court expert opinion on uniformity of goods in context of indeterminacy of their origin and type for one of the largest Ural companies, accused of trademark infringement; as the result the declarant dropped his claims at the first court session.
• Preparation of a substantiated response to the Rospatent’s examination of trademark application for one of Ural largest construction holding; as the result the trademark was registered.
• Trademark prosecution, filing and registration for a clerical tailoring studio.
• Out-of-court expert opinion and consulting on a defense strategy against charge of trademark infringement. Later the complainant’s conflict trademarks were nullified due to unfair competition.